Hi Andrei, yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase. But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL and/or Aether.
Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?) Toni On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin < [email protected]> wrote: > *Alin*, *Toni, * hello; > > 1) I just noticed you are primary authors here: > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url > > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java > > and learned that you must be the authority in this area: > http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992 > > 2) can you please comment on the question below: > > *"maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies" > * > I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them > automatically > by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-) > what am I missing? > > Thank you, > > Andrei > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies > From: Andrei Pozolotin > <[email protected]><[email protected]> > To: General Ops4j <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, Les > Hazlewood <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, Bartosz Kowalewski > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT > > *Bartek, Les*, *Niclas, *hello; > > can you please let me know how did you resolve this: > > maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies > http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html > > I am still observing the same behavior: > a) fist-level dependencies are resolved > b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved; > > this is in maven 3.0.3 > > Thank you, > > Andrei. > > > -- Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
