*Toni*:
cool! thanks for getting back;
then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
Thank you,
Andrei
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]>
To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]>, General Ops4j
<[email protected]>
Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
> Hi Andrei,
>
> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which
> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL
> and/or Aether.
>
> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
>
> Toni
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> *Alin*, *Toni, * hello;
>
> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors here:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
>
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>
> and learned that you must be the authority in this area:
> http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>
> 2) can you please comment on the question below:
>
> *"maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
> *
> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not
> resolve them automatically
> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
> what am I missing?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>, Bartosz Kowalewski
> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>>
>> *Bartek, Les*, *Niclas, *hello;
>>
>> can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>>
>> maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>
>> I am still observing the same behavior:
>> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
>> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>>
>> this is in maven 3.0.3
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei.
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
