On 27 April 2011 16:36, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> wrote:

>  *Ben*, hello;
>
> 1) I noticed that you are the "author" of this project:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.construct
>
> 2) for the fun of it, I built pax-maven-plugin from git trunk
> and wow, the problems listed below (transitive dependencies) are gone;
>
> 3) any chance you could release this any time soon to maven central?
>   <groupId>org.ops4j</groupId>
>   <artifactId>maven-pax-plugin</artifactId>
>   <version>1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
>
> 4) if not, can you please let me know where do you publish your snapshots?
>
> Hi Andrei,

Apologies, too many oss projects not enough time - I'll see if I can find
some spare time this weekend to stage a release.

-- 
Cheers, Stuart

> Thank you,
>
> Andrei.
>
>  -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Andrei Pozolotin 
> <[email protected]><[email protected]>
> To: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Cc: General OPS4J <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue 26 Apr 2011 04:20:27 PM CDT
>
>  *Stuart*, hello;
>
> 1) congratulations on *OSGi in Action*
> http://manning.com/hall/
> what I have seen on MEAE was very good.
>
> 2) did you know, OPS4J people are missing you :-) and there are 2 questions
> from like a year ago; can you please answer them now?
> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04469.html
>
> 3) basically it seems that you made maven-pax-plugin, but left out the
> ability to build complete deploy-pom.xml (mvn pax:run) with all transitive
> dependencies;
>
> was it intentional? omission? does maven-pax-plugin has any future?
> should we look for other tools? will tycho provide provisioning?
> what is good maven-centric provisioning plugin for osgi?
> and why?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
>  -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 06:26:52 PM CDT
>
> Stuart McCulloch ?
>
> Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around for a while...
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei Pozolotin<[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>  Toni:
>
> cool! thanks for getting back;
> then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, General 
> Ops4j<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
>
> Hi Andrei,
> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which
> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL and/or
> Aether.
> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
> Toni
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin<[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>  Alin, Toni,  hello;
>
> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors 
> here:https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>
> and learned that you must be the authority in this 
> area:http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>
> 2) can you please comment on the question below:
> "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
>
> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them
> automatically
> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
> what am I missing?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]>
> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood 
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,
> Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>
> Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello;
>
> can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>
> maven-pax-plugin and transitive 
> dependencieshttp://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>
> I am still observing the same behavior:
> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>
> this is in maven 3.0.3
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei.
>
>
>
>
>  --
> Toni Menzel Source
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to