*Ben*, hello;
1) I noticed that you are the "author" of this project:
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.construct
2) for the fun of it, I built pax-maven-plugin from git trunk
and wow, the problems listed below (transitive dependencies) are gone;
3) any chance you could release this any time soon to maven central?
<groupId>org.ops4j</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-pax-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
4) if not, can you please let me know where do you publish your
snapshots?
Thank you,
Andrei.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
To: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>
Cc: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
Date: Tue 26 Apr 2011 04:20:27 PM CDT
>
> *Stuart*, hello;
>
> 1) congratulations on *OSGi in Action*
> http://manning.com/hall/
> what I have seen on MEAE was very good.
>
> 2) did you know, OPS4J people are missing you :-) and there are 2
> questions
> from like a year ago; can you please answer them now?
> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04469.html
>
> 3) basically it seems that you made maven-pax-plugin, but left out the
> ability to build complete deploy-pom.xml (mvn pax:run) with all
> transitive dependencies;
>
> was it intentional? omission? does maven-pax-plugin has any future?
> should we look for other tools? will tycho provide provisioning?
> what is good maven-centric provisioning plugin for osgi?
> and why?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
> To: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 06:26:52 PM CDT
>> Stuart McCulloch ?
>>
>> Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around for a
>> while...
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei Pozolotin
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Toni:
>>>
>>> cool! thanks for getting back;
>>> then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>> From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]>
>>> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]>, General Ops4j
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
>>>
>>> Hi Andrei,
>>> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
>>> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which
>>> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL and/or
>>> Aether.
>>> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
>>> Toni
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alin, Toni, hello;
>>>>
>>>> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors here:
>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>>>>
>>>> and learned that you must be the authority in this area:
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>>>>
>>>> 2) can you please comment on the question below:
>>>> "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
>>>>
>>>> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them
>>>> automatically
>>>> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
>>>> what am I missing?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>>>> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]>,
>>>> Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>>>>
>>>> Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello;
>>>>
>>>> can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>>>>
>>>> maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>>>
>>>> I am still observing the same behavior:
>>>> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
>>>> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>>>>
>>>> this is in maven 3.0.3
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Toni Menzel Source
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
