Stuart McCulloch ?

Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around for a while...

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei Pozolotin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Toni:
>
> cool! thanks for getting back;
> then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei
>
> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]>
> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]>, General Ops4j
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
>
> Hi Andrei,
> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which
> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL and/or
> Aether.
> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
> Toni
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Alin, Toni,  hello;
>>
>> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors here:
>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
>>
>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>>
>> and learned that you must be the authority in this area:
>> http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>>
>> 2) can you please comment on the question below:
>> "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
>>
>> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them
>> automatically
>> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
>> what am I missing?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> -------- Original Message  --------
>> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]>,
>> Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]>
>> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>>
>> Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello;
>>
>> can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>>
>> maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>
>> I am still observing the same behavior:
>> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
>> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>>
>> this is in maven 3.0.3
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Toni Menzel Source
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>



-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to