*Stuart*, hello;

    1) congratulations on *OSGi in Action*
    http://manning.com/hall/
    what I have seen on MEAE was very good.

    2) did you know, OPS4J people are missing you :-) and there are 2
    questions
    from like a year ago; can you please answer them now?
    http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04469.html

    3) basically it seems that you made maven-pax-plugin, but left out the
    ability to build complete deploy-pom.xml (mvn pax:run) with all
    transitive dependencies;

    was it intentional? omission? does maven-pax-plugin has any future?
    should we look for other tools? will tycho provide provisioning?
    what is good maven-centric provisioning plugin for osgi?
    and why?

    Thank you,

    Andrei 

-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
To: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 06:26:52 PM CDT
> Stuart McCulloch ?
>
> Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around for a while...
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei Pozolotin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Toni:
>>
>> cool! thanks for getting back;
>> then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> -------- Original Message  --------
>> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>> From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]>
>> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]>, General Ops4j
>> <[email protected]>
>> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
>>
>> Hi Andrei,
>> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
>> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which
>> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL and/or
>> Aether.
>> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
>> Toni
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>     
>>> Alin, Toni,  hello;
>>>
>>> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors here:
>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>>>
>>> and learned that you must be the authority in this area:
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>>>
>>> 2) can you please comment on the question below:
>>> "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
>>>
>>> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them
>>> automatically
>>> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
>>> what am I missing?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message  --------
>>> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>>> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]>,
>>> Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>>>
>>> Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello;
>>>
>>> can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>>>
>>> maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>>
>>> I am still observing the same behavior:
>>> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
>>> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>>>
>>> this is in maven 3.0.3
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Andrei.
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> --
>> Toni Menzel Source
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to