*Stuart*
1) thank you for your response, and readiness to make a release!
2) also, Achim Nierbeck http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ mentioned
that Toni Menzel http://tonimenzel.com/ runs hudson for ops4j:
http://ci.okidokiteam.com/hudson/view/OPS4J/
3) so I thought, may be you can help Toni to convert ops4j master
pom into
http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.sonatype.oss|oss-parent|7|pom
so all these projects can auto-magically appear on sonatype oss
and we do not have to bother you anymore :-)
Thank you,
Andrei
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
From: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]>
To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Tatham <[email protected]>, General OPS4J
<[email protected]>
Date: Wed 27 Apr 2011 07:46:47 PM CDT
> On 27 April 2011 16:36, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> *Ben*, hello;
>
> 1) I noticed that you are the "author" of this project:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.construct
>
> 2) for the fun of it, I built pax-maven-plugin from git trunk
> and wow, the problems listed below (transitive dependencies)
> are gone;
>
> 3) any chance you could release this any time soon to maven
> central?
> <groupId>org.ops4j</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-pax-plugin</artifactId>
> <version>1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
>
> 4) if not, can you please let me know where do you publish
> your snapshots?
>
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Apologies, too many oss projects not enough time - I'll see if I can
> find some spare time this weekend to stage a release.
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
> Thank you,
>
> Andrei.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> To: Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Date: Tue 26 Apr 2011 04:20:27 PM CDT
>>
>> *Stuart*, hello;
>>
>> 1) congratulations on *OSGi in Action*
>> http://manning.com/hall/
>> what I have seen on MEAE was very good.
>>
>> 2) did you know, OPS4J people are missing you :-) and there
>> are 2 questions
>> from like a year ago; can you please answer them now?
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04469.html
>>
>> 3) basically it seems that you made maven-pax-plugin, but
>> left out the
>> ability to build complete deploy-pom.xml (mvn pax:run) with
>> all transitive dependencies;
>>
>> was it intentional? omission? does maven-pax-plugin has any
>> future?
>> should we look for other tools? will tycho provide provisioning?
>> what is good maven-centric provisioning plugin for osgi?
>> and why?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>> From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> To: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 06:26:52 PM CDT
>>> Stuart McCulloch ?
>>>
>>> Not sure if he still has any interest here. Not seen him around for a
>>> while...
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrei Pozolotin
>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Toni:
>>>>
>>>> cool! thanks for getting back;
>>>> then who is the "current living expert" who can answer this?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>> From: Toni Menzel <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> To: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Alin Dreghiciu <[email protected]>
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>, General Ops4j
>>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Mon 25 Apr 2011 03:43:15 PM CDT
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andrei,
>>>> yes, we do have knowledge of the Pax URL codebase.
>>>> But i personally do not have any experience on Pax Construct (which
>>>> maven-pax-plugin is part of), its pretty much unrelated to Pax URL
>>>> and/or
>>>> Aether.
>>>> Also, regarding (2) i think the link is incorrect. (?)
>>>> Toni
>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
>>>> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alin, Toni, hello;
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) I just noticed you are primary authors here:
>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/blob/master/pax-url-aether/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/url/mvn/Handler.java
>>>>>
>>>>> and learned that you must be the authority in this area:
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=7650992
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) can you please comment on the question below:
>>>>> "maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies"
>>>>>
>>>>> I just can not believe that maven-centric tool would not resolve them
>>>>> automatically
>>>>> by default while building deploy-pom.xml for "mvn pax:run" :-)
>>>>> what am I missing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>>> From: Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]>
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> To: General Ops4j <[email protected]>
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> Cc: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>> Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>,
>>>>> Bartosz Kowalewski <[email protected]>
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Sun 24 Apr 2011 01:03:13 PM CDT
>>>>>
>>>>> Bartek, Les, Niclas, hello;
>>>>>
>>>>> can you please let me know how did you resolve this:
>>>>>
>>>>> maven-pax-plugin and transitive dependencies
>>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/pipermail/general/2010q3/004552.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I am still observing the same behavior:
>>>>> a) fist-level dependencies are resolved
>>>>> b) deeper dependencies are NOT resolved;
>>>>>
>>>>> this is in maven 3.0.3
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Toni Menzel Source
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> general mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
