Hi Simone,

> Andrea is right.
> I think that we should try to avoid the situation where someone "owns"
> the code of coverage, I'd like to have a some critical mass working
> with that codebase, exchanging ideas and bringing in different
> perspectives for that module.
> Since you are working a lot with JAI and coverage I thought that you
> should be somehow involved with the coverage module's maintaireship.
>

I understand completely and agree with both you and Andrea.

For my own part, while I'm a regular user of the coverage classes,
depending on them heavily in my own work, I haven't delved into their
internals very much - hardly at all in fact.  To date, I've tended to
treat them as black boxes and write stuff around them.  I guess this
was partly because I could rely on asking Martin questions rather than
doing my own detective work :)

I certainly want to assist with the coverage module, so I'm happy to
be listed as a co-maintainer.  So I'll spend some time studying the
existing code more thoroughly over the next couple of weeks.

cheers
Michael

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to