Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> Btw, there is another cleanup I would like to make >> <developers> wise. Following suit Simone's example >> I would like to mark all non active developers >> are "Retired module developer" in the pom.xml >> Afaik the practice so far has just been to represent >> what is the current set of developers, but if >> we want to preserve history we can just add >> "Retired" in front of existing roles in the pom. >> Anyone against this? > Adding retired seems fair to me. I'd would like that kind of mention > for Saul on the arcsde module for example, instead of plainly > deleting the entry. > I missed this part of the conversation; I had just been moving the entry to <contributors> - you have to remove the <id> but other than that all the other entry's including roles can still be listed.
In this way <developers> = active; <contributors> = history Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
