Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Gabriel Roldan wrote: >>> Btw, there is another cleanup I would like to make >>> <developers> wise. Following suit Simone's example >>> I would like to mark all non active developers >>> are "Retired module developer" in the pom.xml >>> Afaik the practice so far has just been to represent >>> what is the current set of developers, but if >>> we want to preserve history we can just add >>> "Retired" in front of existing roles in the pom. >>> Anyone against this? >> Adding retired seems fair to me. I'd would like that kind of mention >> for Saul on the arcsde module for example, instead of plainly >> deleting the entry. >> > I missed this part of the conversation; I had just been moving the entry > to <contributors> - you have to remove the <id> but other than that all > the other entry's including roles can still be listed. > > > In this way <developers> = active; <contributors> = history
Why remove the id? It can be used to link real names with the output of "svn log" or "svn blame". Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
