I am not sure what the correct venue is to start a discussion? The admin email list? We don't have IRC breakouts at the moment; it is more that I am doing this with my GeoTools hat on; rather then in conjunction with a release of geoserver or uDig ... so there is not much warning or pull for a release (except from the course materials and library usability side of things).
Currently as it stands imagemosic is not releasable; and has not been for the last last two milestones. Other then that things are proceeding fairly smoothly. It is *very* handy having cite tests being run by hudson as that is our usual slowdown when making a release. The only thing I am sad about is not having a copy of uDig working against 2.7-SNAPSHOT (as that stresses the library in a different direction). Jody On 02/07/2010, at 4:19 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Okay; apparently the RC Notice has come as a surprise. >> This was not my intension; indeed I am a bit annoyed that some >> plugins are still not passing intensive tests and are not ready for a >> release candidate. I have been up front with my intension to make a >> release candidate; but may be able to get by with a milestone release >> if the community feels they are not ready or have not been given >> enough notice. >> The reason I have been making milestone releases from 2.7 is in order >> to ensure the library was ready for a RC this week; there is a >> schedule in JIRA that I have been trying to stick to: - >> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel > > This is the first time I see this planning, besides, I don't remember > a discussion on the mailing list about it, I would not be surprised > if others never saw it or just never considered it binding (e.g., > in GeoServer we have dates in jira but they have no meaning). > > Despite of where it's hosted a schedule has to be discussed, not > just setup unilaterally. > > That said, if everybody is ok with cutting a RC this weekend, I'm > not opposed, what I'm opposed to is the way this is being handled > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
