On 02/07/2010, at 4:32 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Currently as it stands imagemosic is not releasable; and has not been >> for the last last two milestones. Other then that things are >> proceeding fairly smoothly. It is *very* handy having cite tests >> being run by hudson as that is our usual slowdown when making a >> release. > > Cite tests are running only against 2.0.x, you get no testing > on trunk at all. I believe we don't have enough disk space on > the build server to make them run now, we hope the situation > will improve.
Darn. Good thing Victor was going to run cite tests against trunk and get back to me. > But in the meantime there is no such coverage. And I am sure our build boxes are taxed to within an inch of their life; thanks BTW it was useful to use hudson today. >> The only thing I am sad about is not having a copy of uDig >> working against 2.7-SNAPSHOT (as that stresses the library in a >> different direction). > > That is indeed problematic, especially given the amount of changes that went > into 2.7.x I will be talking to the uDig community about that later in the month; I have a backlog of activities; as just like with geotools/ trunk is needed to support active development and cannot be shut off to suite an undefined release schedule. :-P > I'm also questioning the idea of going to RC without a set of betas > before it. I am not sure we have had beta's of GeoTools before; usually the first couple release candidates match a beta of GeoServer. Indeed the place of milestone releases has basically been taken by maven at the moment. I was specifically issuing the last two milestone releases to prepare for this time. > In this sense you decided there won't be any more api changes and > decided to go RC, but RC means ready to be released unless major > bugs are found. Yet we haven't done any QA on trunk that I know of, > so a beta (feature complete, potentially buggy) would be more > appropriate and less controversial imho. As indicated I could go for that ... and that has been the traditional role a RC has played for GeoTools is it not? Have a look here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/geotools/files/ 2.6.0 2.6-RC1 2.6-M3 2.6-M2 2.6-M1 Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
