As far as i can see, the API does not answer the bounce question.

Please, does some one know if bounce is included in the numbers?
Thanks, regards, hansmuller

Op Ma, 18 januari, 2016 2:31 pm schreef Maarten Brinkerink:
> https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874
> <https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874>
>
>
>> Op 18 jan. 2016, om 14:28 heeft Lizzy Jongma <l.jon...@rijksmuseum.nl>
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>> I noticed that Baglama 2 mentioned a new service: an API. I am under
>> the impression that the API is going to replace the current service.
>> Does anyone know wether this is true? I tried to work with the API but
>> I am not a JSON expert and so far got no understandable data….
>> Best wishes
>> Lizzy Jongma, Rijksmuseum
>>
>>> On 18 Jan 2016, at 14:21, Hans Muller <j.m.mul...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Magnus' tool BaGLAMa 2 (detailed Pageview analysis) is extremely
>>> valuable to track interest for GLAM donations, and to convince GLAMs
>>> how useful their donation is or could be.
>>>
>>> One question remains:
>>> * Is the bounce (click and immediately/quickly gone) component
>>> included/excluded in the number of pageviews?
>>>
>>> I always thought that bounce was included because it is much harder
>>> to exclude it, so i used the numbers with a caveat and only relatively
>>> to each other, but then perhaps the tool tacitly assumes that a
>>> pageview only counts when the dwell time exceeds say ...?? sec?
>>>
>>> With Google analytics on other websites one finds that the bounce
>>> component routinely is of the order of 30%, so perhaps for wikimedia
>>> sites the same amount holds.
>>>
>>> Perhaps someone knows, thanks and best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> User:Hansmuller
>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
>>>
>>>
>>> PS Example:
>>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/baglama2/#gid=205&month=201512
>>>
>>>
>>> with many pageviews thanks to the often-clicked article Mumbai
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>> Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glamtools mailing list
>> Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>
>
>



_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools

Reply via email to