I am so free as to start a new thread for Lizzy, to keep questions about
API and Bounce separate

hansmuller
>
>
> Op Ma, 18 januari, 2016 2:31 pm schreef Maarten Brinkerink:
>
>> https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874
>> <https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Op 18 jan. 2016, om 14:28 heeft Lizzy Jongma
>>> <l.jon...@rijksmuseum.nl>
>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed that Baglama 2 mentioned a new service: an API. I am under
>>> the impression that the API is going to replace the current service.
>>> Does anyone know wether this is true? I tried to work with the API
>>> but I am not a JSON expert and so far got no understandable data….
>>> Best wishes
>>> Lizzy Jongma, Rijksmuseum
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 18 Jan 2016, at 14:21, Hans Muller <j.m.mul...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Magnus' tool BaGLAMa 2 (detailed Pageview analysis) is extremely
>>>> valuable to track interest for GLAM donations, and to convince GLAMs
>>>>  how useful their donation is or could be.
>>>>
>>>> One question remains:
>>>> * Is the bounce (click and immediately/quickly gone) component
>>>> included/excluded in the number of pageviews?
>>>>
>>>> I always thought that bounce was included because it is much harder
>>>>  to exclude it, so i used the numbers with a caveat and only
>>>> relatively to each other, but then perhaps the tool tacitly assumes
>>>> that a pageview only counts when the dwell time exceeds say ...??
>>>> sec?
>>>>
>>>> With Google analytics on other websites one finds that the bounce
>>>> component routinely is of the order of 30%, so perhaps for wikimedia
>>>>  sites the same amount holds.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps someone knows, thanks and best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> User:Hansmuller
>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS Example:
>>>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/baglama2/#gid=205&month=201512
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> with many pageviews thanks to the often-clicked article Mumbai
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>>> Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>> Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools

Reply via email to