Bruce Dawson wrote: >BTW: Back in the mid-to-late-90's I was a member of a UG that had a >vendor try to "take over" by doing exactly this (they wanted to get rid >of the non-commercialization policy). However, people got suspicious >when about 30 names showed up one day from the same domain. A more >sophisticated "attack" is easy, and harder to detect. I believe they >subsequently required a physical presence at a meeting to vote. > > > I'm a bit confused. Did one person make up a bunch of email addresses at the same company/domain, or did the company ask a bunch of employees to join/vote? I'd hate to see us have to require physical presence to vote, I don't think we'd get a representative cross section that way.
Heather _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
