+1 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Trey Roby <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a significant difference between having to watch the GWT > Contributor Google group and an official post to the GWT blog. Not > posting to the official blog is surely a sign of internal GWT > problems. A healthy project is going to have official updates. > > We are very tied to GWT and think it is a great product. We have > written Web apps on a scale that would be very difficult with straight > JavaScript. > > I would really like to see key signs of health. > > Trey > > > On Apr 11, 6:12 am, Joshua Kappon <shuky.kap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I understand (and do that), but I think GWT should get more attention > from > > Google, and that it is not enough. > > GWT is amazing, absolutely amazing. Google has developer advocates that > are > > helping with the G+ platform, android, Chrome web store, chromium OS and > > more, they publish new content, hear the developers (that use the SDKs), > > organize events and more. > > I would love to see GWT getting a fraction of that attention from Google > > (like it did in 2008) - > > It would help the GWT community, it will raise more awareness, more > online > > resources, more everything. > > > > I would really love if we somehow could reach open ears there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 5:01:31 PM UTC+3, Patrick Tucker wrote: > > > > > If you watch the GWT Contributor Google group, you can see what is > being > > > reviewed/worked on, what is getting committed to trunk and what not... > > > > > On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1:04:15 PM UTC-4, Trey Roby wrote: > > > > >> It has been about 4 months since Ray's post on what the GWT team is > > >> working on. In that time there has been only one GWT official blog > > >> update and no releases for 6 months. > > > > >> After reading the link that Alan suggested, I am encouraged but on > > >> slightly since the post is several months old. There needs to be some > > >> official signs of life. If the GWT group is fully staffed then it > > >> should not be possible to communicate that in some way. > > > > >> At Caltech we have been using GWT for over 4 years. We have build a > > >> very large and amazing set of web applications using GWT. We are very > > >> invested in GWT and I am eager to see some more obvious signs of life. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
