On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 07:27:36PM +0100, Rob Shakir wrote: > I'd like to ask the WG their collective opinion on a couple of matters in > this draft, which come from some discussions at IETF83 (in particular with > John Scudder and Adam Simpson) about how the requirements are currently > written regarding repeated errors.
In reviewing this thread, there's another possible tool we could leverage. The consensus seems to be trending toward "if the session is bad enough, take it down. Potentially hold it down if it continues to be bad." An alternative before you get to such a stage is to perform BGP graceful shutdown procedures on the session's routes. This permits the routes to be routes of last resort until the issue is dealt with. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
