On Monday, May 07, 2012 10:58 AM, Jeffrey Haas <> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 07:27:36PM +0100, Rob Shakir wrote: >> I'd like to ask the WG their collective opinion on a couple of >> matters in this draft, which come from some discussions at IETF83 >> (in particular with John Scudder and Adam Simpson) about how the >> requirements are currently written regarding repeated errors. > > In reviewing this thread, there's another possible tool we could > leverage. The consensus seems to be trending toward "if the session > is bad enough, take it down. Potentially hold it down if it > continues to be bad." > > An alternative before you get to such a stage is to perform BGP > graceful shutdown procedures on the session's routes. This permits > the routes to be routes of last resort until the issue is dealt with.
That raises the possibility that the routes are actually used. That may cause loops. -- Jakob Heitz. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
