On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:47:08 +0100 Keith Edmunds <k...@midnighthax.com> wrote:
Hello Keith,
>I believe it's £130. I can't help thinking BT would take a lot more
Well, I did say it's probably more now. :-)
>interest if, when they attended and found there WAS a BT fault, they had
>to pay the subscriber £130. That would seem fair, wouldn't it?
Actually, they do. But only after you've been without a line for a
period of time. I don't recall what time scale it is, though. They had
to compensate us for delays at installation time; Two dozen telegraph
poles got replaced before an engineer could climb a ladder to run a bit
of cable three feet to our house.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
Is she really going out with him?
New Rose - The Damned
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------
