agree to both the points. Thanks Sachin
On 4/7/16, 11:24 PM, "Willy Tarreau" <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: >On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:59:24PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote: >> Hi Willy, >> >> Sorry for the confusion. I wrote to you much before in my >>investigation. I >> will take care going forward. > >OK but in general the point remains, and it's not just for you but for >everyone in general, the mailing list is here to reach around 1000 persons >at once, so once your message is posted, you have to keep in mind that >several of them will start to think about your problem even if they don't >respond, which is why it is very important to be transparent about any >progress made on parallel investigation or parallel contacts. Just like >when you ask something to two distinct coworkers, one gives you a fast >response, the other ones comes the next day and says "I've setup a lab >yesterday to check what you asked me and I found this last night". You'll >feel bad telling him "Oh I already got the response, thank you anyway". > >> Only now I realized that I messed up the version numbers because it >>seems >> we have different versions in our cluster. > >OK similarly there's nothing wrong telling errors in bug reports, we all >do this because we test lots of stuff and we end up confusing things. But >once you notice something was wrong, simply respond again and fix the >information. Reliable versions helps eliminate candidate patches and also >help people joining saying "same problem here". > >> We are now testing with 1.6.4 and trying to fast track it. > >OK thanks for the feedback! > >Willy >
