WinterLight,
That is a really great question. I suppose you have been doing same for
some years PAST with great (or grumbly) success. I still salute this.
I never felt comfortable with the entire concept (at the time, or still.) OK.
Now it is now. I do comprehend what you suggest. Time for change! Get IT!
Still a bit "Tin-Hat" about the World Wide Waste!
After this fix, trust me(!), I will step into the world of the "globally"
in-franchised.
I just sorta thought I could still manage business right here at the home 20.
Shame on me. Matrox Forever!
Thank you.
Duncan
At 12:00 09/29/2008 -0700, you wrote:
I can understand why this works for the general public who doesn't
understand domains, ftp etc. But
why is that a better deal for you then just buying a domain name from
Goddady for 7-10 bucks a year and then having a free 10GB website that you
can ftp into, and then upload your backup in an encrypted zip file ?
At 11:53 AM 9/29/2008, you wrote:
I use JungleDisk and Amazon S3 for my personal offsite backup. I know it's
not completely bulletproof, but for a couple bucks a month it's well worth
it for the 10 GB of data I really, really care about.
------
Brian
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:50 PM, maccrawj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1TB Seagate 7200.11 SATA-300 drive $130
> USB2/eSATA Icydock MB559US-1SMB enclosure $45 after MIR
> Peace of mind knowing key data is backed up offline, priceless!
>
> =)
>
>
> DHSinclair wrote:
>
>> Thank you Greg. Kind of terse, but I do fully comprehend your points. So
>> far, my data loss will be any/all digital pixs I took post 03/07 and some
>> archived dot-pdf files that support my home care equipment. Suspect
that I
>> can probably find most of this again.
>>
>> I never attempted to use the RAID of the server as a substitute for
proper
>> backup policy. It just turned out the my server did have the largest
>> available free space (23GB). OK, shame on me. I do try to "backup" to
>> available space wherever available on my LAN clients until I can get
a NAS
>> operational.
>>
> <snip>
>
