On 21 July 2006 at 9:09, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > I tried to use it. It is OK, but I have some comments on it. First of all,
> > let me describe as I see the testing process:
> > 
> > - for developers:
> > Before the commit of new feature/ fix the developer should run some
> > 'pre-integration tests' (it may be unit tests) to be sure that workspace
> > will not broken by commit. If developer have more than 1 platform it will
> > nice to run these tests on different platforms.
> > It is a base testing infrastructure for any project and Harmony already has
> > it (for both - vm and api).
> 
> That is the assumption, right?  Every developer should already be doing
> this.
> 
> > 
> > Also, the "cruise control" systems on the target platforms over
> > 'pre-integration tests' will be very useful just to check that the current
> > workspace is OK (not all developers can check fixes on all target
> > platforms).
> 
> Right
> 
> > 
> > - for other community members (all peoples who want to help):
> > If somebody wants to help to run tests he should download only the binary
> > form of HDK, tests and script(s) to run it. Than he run all tests and
> > upload/ emails results back. Of cause, these scripts should require minimum
> > external tools (for example, 'ant' only).
> > It is may be one time action for this member or time-to-time (depends on
> > his
> > wishes).
> > 
> > In this context seems a little bit discourteous to ask users to use the
> > cruise control, svn, c/c++ compilers etc to run Harmony tests. On other
> > side, for developers your system is a little bit excessive.
> 
> I don't agree that it's so black and white.  There's a valid point in
> that some people might want to volunteer to run things, and that we can
> minimize the tooling requirements.  But that can be solved easily :
> 
> 1) we produce a snapshot of buildtest/
> 2) we add another configuration that fetches an HDK and runs the tests
> 
> (Actually, this is a good idea, and I look forward to seeing your patch!)
> 
> Seriously, that's not a bad idea, and it would only require having ant
> and Java.  No need for SVN or other tools.

I was planning to jar up tests from modules just as I have with the test
support classes (in  build/test/support.jar) and I'd expect those to 
remain in the hdk.

Adding an ant script to run the tests would not be trivial - due to the
api/impl/bootclasspath/etc issues - but should be possible.

-Mark.

> > 
> > - for testing engineer (or somebody from developers):
> > Looking through the result reports for different platforms, tries to
> > reproduce detected failures and propose fixes for them.
> > 
> > Of cause, it is my thoughts only and may be it does not true, but I want to
> > try to prepare testing scripts based on HDK (or snapshots of workspace) and
> > tests archives.
> 
> it's not an either-or though.  See if you can consider using the
> testbuild config - with a combination of a new ant target and different
> config for CC - that does what you suggest - fetches  the HDK and runs
> against it..
> 
> geir
> 
> > 
> > Thanks, Vladimir
> > On 7/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Blewitt wrote:
> >> > FWIW Mac OS X doesn't have tools.jar in $JAVA_HOME/lib. Instead, the
> >> > tools are in the classes.jar file (no, it's not called rt.jar either)
> >> > in $JAVA_HOME/../Classes/classes.jar. It's a bit unfortunate that it
> >> > has both the run-time libraries and the tools in one place, but
> >> > essentially it means that the sun tools are on the classpath whatever
> >> > happens.
> >> >
> >> > Not that it's spectacularly relevant, but I thought I'd mention it
> >> > here in case there's going to be a Mac port in the future ...
> >>
> >> What do you mean "in case"? :)  I'm hoping we can do that sooner rather
> >> than later...
> >>
> >> geir
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Alex.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11/07/06, Geir Magnusson Jr < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Richard Liang wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It seems that JAVA_HOME is required by cc/cruisecontrol.sh on my
> >> Ubuntu
> >> >> > :-)  Do I miss something? Thanks a lot.
> >> >>
> >> >> That seems to be the case :)  If you set it, does it work?
> >> >>
> >> >> It seems to want it for two things, tools.jar (for it's JSPs?) and
> >> where
> >> >> to find java executable.  The latter we just deal with (expect it
> >> to be
> >>
> >> >> on the executable path), but tools is more interesting....
> >> >>
> >> >> geir
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to