Not necessarily, I've had people from my group tell me about how great it is and how annoying it's been what Valve has done. Though I feel maybe that would be more of someone wanting to see *my* community do good and less interested in the how / why. But I dunno, it's hard to say.
And hey no need for "come on guys" , any idea is worth while and there is no need to bash anything On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek < proph...@sticed.org> wrote: > A non server op also wouldn't care about servers. Simple as that. Yes, you > should pick multiple people, and the right ones. But yes, you should at > least pick someone who represents your party. Not only in terms of having > an actual representative, but someone who shares the expertise and point of > view. Come on guys. > > On 19.12.2015 01:17, Rowedahelicon wrote: > > I think a non serverop would be great. > > The personal investments are what drives everyone the way it does I > imagine, but a non server op wouldn't need to care about a particular > server, just the game itself. I think finding a candidate though would be > difficult, unless we put together some input polls and gave it to our > respective communities? > > -- > *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson* > Web Designer / Artist / Writer > Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit:https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > -- *Matthew (Rowedahelicon) Robinson* Web Designer / Artist / Writer Website - http://www.rowedahelicon.com/
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds
