Okay.. Ill give both methods a shot and see what happens.. ;)
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: Dustin Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: WAS Re: Recomendations? NOW RM1x Section Copy?
> You just go to the copy pattern function man.
> Dustin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 12:42 PM
> Subject: WAS Re: Recomendations? NOW RM1x Section Copy?
>
>
> > Yeah, me too.. but some of it is just soo kik @ss that I cant stand it!
;)
> > I absolutely LOVE my ex5r.. I mean, honestly, where can you get a basic
> > sampler with decent FX AND a great sound engine to go along with it for
> 900
> > usd? (btw, you cannot get them for that much anymore, i guess the demand
> has
> > managed to outstrip the #of units available and the price shot back up
> > again.. Kinda like it did for the CS1x)
> >
> > AS for the RM1x.. Mine acts just a little flakey sometimes, but overall
> its
> > absolutely great to have all those basic sounds that IMHO are about
> > equivalent to something like an Emu Orbit, decent FX, AND a great
> sequencer
> > with many very useable patterns already built-in and great midi
> > implementation..
> >
> >
> > Only question I have about the RM1x is how do you copy an entire section
> to
> > another section? Seems like an elemental function because most of the
time
> > you are just going to add or subtract from the same basic pattern to
make
> > your songs and it would be great to be able to copy an entire section
then
> > mess with the mutes and such and then go on to the next section.
> >
> > Needless to say it is my most used machine..Once you get your mind
wrapped
> > around it you will want nothing else for sequencing (cept maybe seq303
to
> > get a few ideas.) ;)
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dustin Zahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 10:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: Recomendations?
> >
> >
> > > I try to stay away from Yamaha gear everytime I buy something, buy you
> > > can't! Hehe. The A3000 is the best sampler for the money, and the RM1x
> is
> > > the best sequencer for the money. It works so good with the A3000.
It's
> > got
> > > all the recording options you ask for too, and it's easy to use. Grab
it
> > > now, you won't be sorry.
> > > Dustin Zahn (Tronix)
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Nigel Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2000 6:27 AM
> > > Subject: Recomendations?
> > >
> > >
> > > > hi there, I just added myself to this list, as I'm in the market for
a
> > > > better hardware sequencer. I thought I'd offer up what I'm looking
> for,
> > > > what I'm thinking of getting, and then hopefully getting some
feedback
> > > > from some of you...?
> > > >
> > > > the mainstay of my studio and live rig is my A3000 sampler. I've got
> > 98Mb
> > > of
> > > > ram, so I can usually load a whole set at once. other midi things
get
> > used
> > > > live as well.
> > > >
> > > > I really want something that I can write sequences on directly, with
a
> > > step
> > > > sequencer as well as a real-time record function, but that I can
also
> > > import
> > > > sequences easily as midi files from a computer based system. I want
to
> > be
> > > > able to do more when I play live than ride sequences, I want to be
> able
> > to
> > > > change patterns, tempo, controllers, etc.
> > > >
> > > > I've already got a Yamaha QY-70, which is ok, but kind of limited...
I
> > > have
> > > > to thin out controller data heaps to get more than a couple of songs
> in
> > > > memory, and it's small. I was thinking about trading in the sampler
> for
> > an
> > > > SU-700, but there's no envelopes on an SU-700... ;-( So now I'm
> tossing
> > up
> > > > between an RM1x and a QY-700, and the RM1x seems cheaper and possibl
y
> > > > better. (i have thought about non-yamaha gear... ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Any suggestions?
> > > >
> > > > I'm willing to trade in the sampler if I can find a performance
based
> > > device
> > > > that is still a good sampler in it's own right... but there just
> doesn't
> > > > seem to be anything around, so I thought a sequencer would be
better.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ////nigel kersten_____ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > |||||
> > > > |||| - c i n d i i -
> > > > ||| http://4trak.net/cindii
> > > > || ||||| ||||| |||||
> > > > | ||||| ||||| ||||| |||||
> > > > _________synths n beats n stuff\\\\\
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
