To go beyond 2042, you'd have to use the ETOD (128 bit) format, but even with that, it didn't work as of, maybe, z/OS 1.6, which is where I last tried it. I think it was the TIME macro that returned an error if I asked for an STCKE value for any year greater than 2042.
--Art At 03:53 PM 9/4/2007, Ed Gould wrote: [...snip...] >You bring up an interesting question (to me). I wonder if anyone did >during the Y2K testing try a date later that 2042. > ================================================== Art Celestini Celestini Development Services Phone: 201-670-1674 Wyckoff, NJ ============= http://celestini.com ============= Mail sent to the "From" address used in this post will be rejected by our server. Please send off- list email to: ibmmain<at-sign>celestini<dot>com. ================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
