Hello And thanks to everyone,

        I do appreciate everyone's input and opinions.   We have the
memory.

8 gig total,  5 gig defined for storage,  2 gig to xstore, and the rest
used 
by the HMC.  

        I do think that the problem is the MDC is only hitting 77-80%
and the 
cpu gets driven up to 100%.   It was at 92% before I do the SET MDC
SYSTEM ON.   I am weighting the overall results of the MDC to storage to
CPU.

        This is a NOMAD2/ULTRAQUEST/TCPIP set of transactions.

q xstore                                                          
XSTORE= 2048M online= 2048M                                       
XSTORE= 2048M userid= SYSTEM usage= 51% retained= 0M pending= 0M  
XSTORE MDC min=0M, max=1024M, usage=49%                           
XSTORE= 2048M userid=  (none)  max. attach= 2048M                 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:01:25                                       
q store                                                           
STORAGE = 5G                                                      
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 10:01:59                                       
ind                                                               
AVGPROC-099% 01                                                   
XSTORE-000000/SEC MIGRATE-0000/SEC                                
MDC READS-000488/SEC WRITES-000006/SEC HIT RATIO-077%             
STORAGE-012% PAGING-0001/SEC STEAL-000%                           
Q0-00001(00000)                           DORMANT-00018 
Q1-00000(00000)           E1-00000(00000)               
Q2-00000(00000) EXPAN-001 E2-00000(00000)               
Q3-00005(00000) EXPAN-001 E3-00000(00000)               
PROC 0000-099%                                          
LIMITED-00000                                                    

Ed Martin 
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ext. 40441
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:06 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: MDC, Storage, xstore, and cache on External dasd.
> 
> Your concern is justified.
> 
> The question is....real memory vs CPU.
> 
> You shouldn't have much of an I/O bottleneck with your caching
> controller, assumming you have ficon or better channel speeds.
> 
> But if your read I/O is satisfied from MDC, you won't go thru the I/O
> boundry which is a saving in CPU time.
> 
> So the question becomes can you allocate sufficient real memory for
MDC
> in order to have a sufficiently high MDC read hit ratio, to have a
real
> savings in CPU?  Or do you care about a few percent savings in CPU?
> 
> If you are tight in main memory, it may be better to eliminate MDC and
> use the memory to reduce paging.
> If you are tight in CPU, then the CPU savings may be worth it.
> 
> An old rule of thumb was caching closer to the application is better
> than caching farther away from the application.  But that is only if
the
> memory for caching was of equal sizes.  I would rather have 6 GB
> controller cache, then 2 MB for VSAM buffers.
> 
> Anyway, I would experiment with MDC cache.  If you can't get a high
hit
> ratio, say 95% or better, I would turn it off.  But there is always
> "that application" that may benefit greatly, for a short period of
time,
> by the use of MDC.
> 
> Tom Duerbusch
> THD Consulting
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/11/2006 1:27 PM >>>
> Hello Everyone,
> 
>       I have found some time here to re-evaluate some parameters.
> 
>       We have a large amount of Cache (6 gig) on the EMC box.  The
> EMC
> is doing lots of
> caching.
> 
>       I am wondering about the overhead of the dual caching and the
> benefits.
> It seems to me that having MDC on for the system is just overhead and
> dual caching.
> 
> 
> z/VM side
> q cache 740
> 0740 CACHE 0 available for subsystem
> 0740 CACHE 1 available for subsystem
> 06324150K Bytes configured
> 06324150K Bytes available
> 00000000K Bytes offline
> 00000000K Bytes pinned
> 
> 0740 CACHE activated for device
> 
> VSE/ESA side
> 
> cache subsys=740,status
> AR 0015 SUBSYSTEM CACHING STATUS: ACTIVE
> AR 0015         CACHE FAST WRITE: ACTIVE
> AR 0015            CACHE STORAGE: CONFIG.  .......   6324150K
> AR 0015            CACHE STORAGE: AVAIL.   .......   6324150K
> AR 0015               NVS STATUS: AVAILABLE
> AR 0015              NVS STORAGE: CONFIG.  .......    196608K
> AR 0015 1I40I  READY
> 
> cache subsys=740,report
> 
> AR 0015 3990-E9 SUBSYSTEM COUNTERS REPORT
> 
> AR 0015 VOLUME 'RAM040' DEVICE ID=X'00'
> 
> AR 0015                               CHANNEL OPERATIONS
> 
> AR 0015                 <----SEARCH/READ---->
> <-------------WRITE------------>
> AR 0015                 <----SEARCH/READ---->
> <-------------WRITE------------>
> AR 0015                    TOTAL   CACHE-READ    TOTAL  CACHE-WRITE
> DASD-FAST
> AR 0015 REQUESTS
> 
> AR 0015   NORMAL         837170781  824709019    7467393    7463857
> 7467393
> AR 0015   SEQUENTIAL      13620747   13148843     168445     168286
> 168445
> AR 0015   CACHE FAST WRT         0          0          0          0
> N/A
> AR 0015
> 
> AR 0015 TOTALS           850791528  837857862    7635838    7632143
> 7635838
> AR 0015
> 
> AR 0015 REQUESTS
> 
> AR 0015   INHIBIT CACHE LOADING             0
> 
> AR 0015   BYPASS CACHE                     31
> 
> AR 0015
> 
> AR 0015 DATA TRANSFERS             DASD->CACHE          CACHE->DASD
> 
> AR 0015   NORMAL                      9571687                762405
> 
> AR 0015   SEQUENTIAL                  1600428                   N/A
> 
> AR 0015 1I40I  READY
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ed Martin
> Aultman Health Foundation
> 330-588-4723
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ext. 40441

Reply via email to