This sort of leads into a thread from last spring for SHUTRAP to enable
SVM's to be enabled for SIGNALS.
I think there was a WAVV requirement for that.

--- maybe the windoze folks could help out, you know 'click START to
shutdown' :) --- 

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Thomas Kern
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:01 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Changing privclass of SHUTDOWN


With the corresponding commands:
  CP QUERY SHUTDOWN SYSNAME
and
  CP DEFINE SHUTDOWN SYSNAME name TYPE CP/SIGNAL/FORCE

The FORCE being there for the SVMs that we know are non-responsive but we
would like to see handled in the same manner/syntax as the latest&greatest
SVMs (that run linux).

/Tom Kern
/301-903-2211


On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:24:59 -0600, Huegel, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>And to take it a step further as Thomas Kern suggested.
>
>Then maybe 'SHUTDOWN RSCS' could be a CP synonym for 'SIGNAL SHUTDOWN USER
>RSCS', if RSCS understood signals. Could TCPIP or Dirmaint (or other
servers
>besides SFS and Linux) be taught to obey a SHUTDOWN signal?
>
>SYSCONFIG:
>shutdown_systemname type
>MYVM                CP
>RSCS                SIGNAL
>LINUX1              SIGNAL
>.
>.
>.
>.


__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside
VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com

Reply via email to