This sort of leads into a thread from last spring for SHUTRAP to enable SVM's to be enabled for SIGNALS. I think there was a WAVV requirement for that.
--- maybe the windoze folks could help out, you know 'click START to shutdown' :) --- -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas Kern Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 11:01 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Changing privclass of SHUTDOWN With the corresponding commands: CP QUERY SHUTDOWN SYSNAME and CP DEFINE SHUTDOWN SYSNAME name TYPE CP/SIGNAL/FORCE The FORCE being there for the SVMs that we know are non-responsive but we would like to see handled in the same manner/syntax as the latest&greatest SVMs (that run linux). /Tom Kern /301-903-2211 On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:24:59 -0600, Huegel, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >And to take it a step further as Thomas Kern suggested. > >Then maybe 'SHUTDOWN RSCS' could be a CP synonym for 'SIGNAL SHUTDOWN USER >RSCS', if RSCS understood signals. Could TCPIP or Dirmaint (or other servers >besides SFS and Linux) be taught to obey a SHUTDOWN signal? > >SYSCONFIG: >shutdown_systemname type >MYVM CP >RSCS SIGNAL >LINUX1 SIGNAL >. >. >. >. __________________________________________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside VM-List for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com