>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2007 at 9:15 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mrohs, Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Here's a current swap status on SLES10 with 400M. > > swapon -s > > Filename Type Size Used > Priority > /dev/dasdf1 partition 74988 63932 > -1 > /dev/dasdg1 partition 149988 23064 > -2 > /dev/dasdh1 partition 224988 23088 > -3 > > Does this imply that dasdg1 completely filled up before using dasdh1?
I'm unsure about how negative priorities work, but yes, the fact that they are different priorities implies that at some point, the first swap space filled up, then the second swap space, and then some was used of the third. If you're not seeing significant paging *rates* then this isn't necessarily a problem. It could just be that some really huge amount of startup code got paged out over time. If you are seeing significant rates, then it's time to bump up the amount of storage assigned to this system. Mark Post