Not that I mind having it written on the CFx disk, I do not use it on any live system, but I seem to remember someone on this list, someone from IBM, saying that the PARM disks were there for our use in customizing the system and that they would not be violated by IBM. I don't remember who said it, but I think his initials were A.A.
Regards, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:20 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: CP's Parm Disks > > On Monday, 03/08/2010 at 12:34 EST, "Steinback, Gerald" > <gerald.steinb...@bankofamerica.com> wrote: > > Sorry I'm late to the party, but this is becoming a very interesting > topic. > > > > Alan - the ONLY way?? Does that mean the lower level tools > of VMSES/E > such > > as our long time friends vmfREC, vmfAPPLY and vmfBUILD will > no longer > > be available? > > vmfREC and Friends will still be there. With your CP mods > appropriately identified, SERVICE will include them and build > a CPLOAD MODULE on the CF2 disk, just as it would with > vmfBUILD. If you don't want vmfBUILD writing on CF2, then > modify the PPF to tell it where you want the module written.
