On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:06 PM Dave Crocker <dcroc...@bbiw.net> wrote:
> As appealing as the AS concept is, I've never been clear how operationally > useful they are. > > More to the current point, if the anti-replay work to be done benefits > from a position on transit vs. non-transit, then including it directly in > an anti-replay specification would be more helpful than in a separate AS. > Fair enough. Does the charter need to say that a revision to best practices, relative to the replay problem, might be a possible output? It's within the realm of possibility that no protocol work comes out of this, but a "checkpoint" about current realities might be good to publish in that case. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
