> From: Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > I'm not certain that this would be the case for a sufficiently constrained > DTD. Something at the level of complexity of the MAN nroff macros in > formatting ability. MAN nroff would be overkill, as demonstrated by the restricted nroff that the RFC editor accepts (or used to accept) for I-D's. And apparently generated from pure ASCII submissions. Vernon Schryver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Michael Richardson
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Vernon Schryver
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Michael Richardson
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Marshall T. Rose
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Vernon Schryver
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Vernon Schryver
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Marshall T. Rose
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Marshall T. Rose
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Michael Mealling
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs joaquin . riverarodriguez
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Jon Crowcroft
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs John Stracke
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs John Stracke