> the hardware problem is the eyes and the hands. i use a pda because i can > put it in my hip pocket. that's just not going to happen with a screen that > half-size or full-size. You're thinking too traditionally. Displays will decouple from the processor (think Bluetooth). The "CPU" will holster on your belt, and the A4 sized thin-film display will fold up to fit in your pocket. And pixel density will increase to approach that of paper. (At 300 DPI you can shrink the font enough to get the better part of a 60x72 character page onto even todays sized PDA displays if you display in landscape.) Or maybe the technology will be something else. The point is that the display technology _will_ be there, and it will be there soon. (Soon enough that current PDA limitations aren't a good enough justification - IMO - for the sort of changes we're talking about making.) --lyndon
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Marshall T. Rose
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Vernon Schryver
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Vernon Schryver
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Marshall T. Rose
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Marshall T. Rose
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Michael Mealling
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Bora Akyol
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs joaquin . riverarodriguez
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs Jon Crowcroft
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs John Stracke
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs John Stracke
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs Rosen, Brian
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs graham . travers
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs John Stracke