> There is a use for XML or nroff versions of I-D's (but not RFC's) that
> has not been mentioned much (maybe first in your mention of "ASCII memos
> can't be reformatted").  It saves lots of work to exchange editorial
changes
> as deltas to a mark up language version.

i agree. this certainly is of value to the folks who author I-Ds.

> Perhaps in other words, allow XML in ftp.isi.edu:internet-drafts but
> not in ftp.isi.edu:in-notes

i agree. i'm not asking that we publish RFCs in any new formats. i'm
suggesting that we experiment for 9 months in the I-D area.

/mtr


Reply via email to