> Fourth--so can a Linux/OSS-competitor be allowed to rule the agenda? > No. We worked hard, behind the scenes, with microsoft, to ensure that none > of their messages chided the Linux/OSS philosophy. Where-ever, we felt > that there were chances of a debate, we prepared our teams and some > members of the community to ensure that the Linux/OSS message was put > across strongly. The CXOSummit was a major case in point, where we knew > Frost & Sullivan would table the "TOC study", but advanced preparation and > some great panellists ensured that Linux/OSS emerged stronger--and that > infront of some of the leading CXOs of Delhi. (I hope a few members of the > LUG were there at the CXOsummit, and can share their experience.)
I attend CXOsummit and listen case study of Frost & Sullivan. It indicate that CIO should not implement Linux Because TCO of Linux is higher than Windows. That will discourage the CIO, who think to implement Linux in his organization and Microsoft succeed in that motive. [S K Goel] _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
