yeah sure..sorry for that.......By the way here is the link
http://lwn.net/Articles/293906/

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Parthan SR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Arun SAG wrote:
> > I read some where in the internet that, canonical is not contributing
> back
> > to its mother distribution debian.....
> >
> Leaving the debate whether the underlying accusation is true or false,
> please when you are making a statement do state the following,
> [1] completely describe what your statement means. "not contributing
> back" is a vague statement and doesn't mean anything in specific.
> [2] Backup your statement with proof, at least a link where you found
> the accusation to have been made.
> Otherwise making a vague statement based upon your memory to have read
> somewhere doesn't help much.
>
> Just my thoughts.
>
> --
> ---
> With Regards,
>
> Parthan "technofreak"
> <gpg>  2FF01026
> <blog> http://blog.technofreak.in
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
>



-- 
<-Fighting 4 Freedom->
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

Reply via email to