yeah sure..sorry for that.......By the way here is the link http://lwn.net/Articles/293906/
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Parthan SR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Arun SAG wrote: > > I read some where in the internet that, canonical is not contributing > back > > to its mother distribution debian..... > > > Leaving the debate whether the underlying accusation is true or false, > please when you are making a statement do state the following, > [1] completely describe what your statement means. "not contributing > back" is a vague statement and doesn't mean anything in specific. > [2] Backup your statement with proof, at least a link where you found > the accusation to have been made. > Otherwise making a vague statement based upon your memory to have read > somewhere doesn't help much. > > Just my thoughts. > > -- > --- > With Regards, > > Parthan "technofreak" > <gpg> 2FF01026 > <blog> http://blog.technofreak.in > > > _______________________________________________ > ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ > -- <-Fighting 4 Freedom-> _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/