On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is said that all the users are testing the software. What is > the point of having testers when the benefit is not passed on upstream > to benefit everyone? That is the critical point in Greg's talk. Ubuntu > efforts benefit Ubuntu. They are not close source, but unlike the rest > of the free software world, they make no effort to feed any changes > back upstream.
GPL doens`t says that when you use some code , Go spoonfeed the changes back to developers, The code is open all there , And the point made by canonical not to make it upstream for each project is valid and practical. No way some company go behind 1000`s bugzilla to track what`s happening -- Thanks and Regards Gaurav Mishra Linux User #348873 http://gauravmishra.info/blog "When i can run , i will run , When i can walk , i will walk, When i can crawl , i will crawl. But i will not stop moving forward" _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
