On 29/06/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug Scott wrote:
> Back to the Java front. I think that it would be a mistake not to
> include the jre in the base, though the jre size on Solaris does concern
> me.
>
> Doug
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> du -hs /usr/jdk/jdk1.6.0/jre
> 124M /usr/jdk/jdk1.6.0/jre
That's certainly a large compromise if we did want to include it.
A good compromise would be a way to make it so the browser could tie
into the packaging system / repository to install missing plugins for
java, flash, etc. on demand.
If it's integrated, that will be far less painful.
The user should not have to search in package manager ala synaptic, etc.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. " --Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
