On 29/11/2007, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 5:56 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, it is not more important. 99.9% of PHP users don't care what process > > we have, they care about how well PHP works for them. If we had best > > process in the world but no support for what people need - people won't > > use PHP just to commend us for oh so good process. Process is important, > > but it's a *tool*, not the *goal*. > > Actually, I believe the latest Gallup Poll sponsored by CNN put > that number at 97.3%. ;-P > > Besides, as I read the message you quoted, my understand was that > Pierre was inferring that it's more important for the community to > have standardized guidelines for contributions, rather than bend to > the whim of one party: in this case, IBM.
Ok, Kreskin - assuming you're as out of the loop as most of the rest of us, if this is purely an IBM thing, why are MySQL AB employees signing up for this (see CVS account request from Jay Pipes)? MySQL AB has its own CLA for contributions to the MySQL code base: http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Contributor_License_Agreement. Maybe they're the ones pushing for a CLA this time around. -- Dan Scott Laurentian University -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
