If you continue to be bound by NAT how are you going to connect all the many many mobile devices to the Internet to exploit the services of upcoming mobile Internet? Is NAT useful for mobile devices?
-----Original Message----- From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 23 September 2003 1:55 PM To: Ron Lee Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?] > Is it really true that most of the market chose to use NAT rather than > tunneling or dual-stack for IPv6 transition mechanism? there is zero truth to that. if you're going to use NAT there is (almost) no point in using IPv6. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
