Thomas,

On Apr 12, 2006, at 12:34 PM, ext Thomas Narten wrote:

Hi Ralph.

Revisiting this thread... I think your proposed text is fine. The only
question I have is that I assume you want to be consistent in
referring to "DHCPv6lite" or "RFC3736" (both are used in the text
below.)  Also, one nit (from my original text!)

With these clarifications, I think this text is fine.

Bob



Thomas

Ralph Droms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Second try, this time with new text on top and explanation below.

   M :

        1-bit "Managed address configuration" flag.  When set, it
        indicates that addresses are available via Dynamic Host
        Configuration Protocol [DHCPv6].  When the M flag is set,
        nodes SHOULD use DHCPv6 to obtain addresses (and associated
        configuration information) to be assigned to the interface on
        which the RA was received.  Note that when the M flag is
set, the setting of the O flag is irrelevant, since the DHCPv6
        server will return all available configuration information
        together with any addresses.

    O :

1-bit "Other configuration" flag. When set, it indicates that DHCPv6 for other configuration information [DHCPv6lite] is available for delivery of other (non-address) information. Examples of such information are DNS-related information or information on other
        servers within the network. When the O flag is set,

         - If the M flag is also set, the O flag is irrelevant (as
           described above) and the node SHOULD use DHCPv6 to obtain
           addresses and associated configuration information.

         - If the M flag is not set, the node SHOULD use DHCPv6 as
           described in RFC3736.

       Note that if neither M nor O are set, the node SHOULD NOT not

s/NOT not/NOT/

       request any information with DHCPv6.


In the interest of simplicity and consistency (note that the protocol in question is referred to as DHCP or DHCPv6 through all of specifications [as well as in the original version of this text], not "DHC"), I suggest the
text above.

Comments on previous earlier text:

including addresses that are likely not available via stateless address
   autoconfiguration.

Deleted as it adds no discernible content to the text.

   Clients SHOULD use DHC to obtain addresses (and associated
   configuration information) as described in [ADDRCONF].

S/Clients/The node/
S/DHC/DHCPv6/
Deleted reference to [ADDRCONF] (what part of [ADDRCONF] was referenced
   here?)
Added reference to interface on which RA was received for clarity

   since the DHC server will return "other"

S/DHC/DHCPv6/
s/"other"/all available configuration information/

   [DHCPv6lite] is available for autoconfiguration of other

s/autoconfiguration/delivery/ because the configuration involves a server
  and is not "autoconfiguration"

   - If the M bit is also set, clients SHOULD use DHC to obtain
     addresses (and associated configuration information) as
     described above.

Reworded for clarity

- Ralph

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to