Thomas - [DHCPv6lite] has square brackets and is a citation. RFC 3736 doesn't have square brackets, is the name of the document (not a citation) and doesn't require an entry in the references.
I used RFC 3736 without brackets because I don't like the construct "described in [DHCPv6lite]". Doesn't much matter, really. OK with me to replace "RFC 3736" with "[DHCPv6lite]". - Ralph On 4/12/06 3:51 PM, "Thomas Narten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I used [DHCPv6lite] as a citation for compatibility with the >> previous revs of the text, and the text RFC 3736 explicitly where I >> wanted to emphasize that there is a specific way to use DHCP >> described in that RFC. > > Not sure I follow this. Does that mean that in the references section > you expect RFC 3736 appear twice? I'm sure the RFC editor will ask > the same question.... > > I.e., what do you want to see in the final RFC? (Assuming we actually > ever agree and ship the darn thing!!! :-) > > Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
