On Aug 5, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
This I don't recall at all... I think part of my question is we (as a
group) are assuming that the reasons for requiring ipv6 udp checksums
as stated +10 years ago are still valid, I don't see data supporting
that fact.
There are some classic papers on this topic. The most recent I could
find is from 2000:
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2000/conf/abstract/9-1.htm
In a quick re-read of this paper, I didn't see anything that is
obviously dated about it. So, I'd assume its error rates and analysis
are still pertinent, unless there is a more recent study that says
otherwise.
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
