Hi, Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:42:56 -0500 "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shem...@cisco.com> wrote > I agree with Dave Thaler from yesterday's discussion in 6man related to > the /127 draft. In the two router scenario for /127, each router is > off-link to the other and then one has nothing to bother about for > anycast address.
To establish an external-BGP session on a link that two routers are connected to, the two routers need to be on-link each other on the link. And we are using /127 for these links in our network. > Folks are also encouraged to read the IPv6 Subnet Model RFC where > off-link has been clarified - RFC 5942. It seems the RFC 5942 is mostly for hosts, not for routers. Thanks, ----- Matsuzaki Yoshinobu <m...@iij.ad.jp> - IIJ/AS2497 INOC-DBA: 2497*629 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
