On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Miya Kohno <mko...@juniper.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> The draft is discussing about inter-router backbone link, where
>>> "directly-connected neighbor" has a significant meaning from
>>> routing protocol point of view. So it needs to be assumed "on-link".
>
>> Even if the two routers are in the off-link model for the IPv6 address

'off link' does not (for the case of this discussion) mean 'off the
ethernet wire', it's a semantic distinction that thayler and shermant
are attempting to make in order to keep the authors from having to go
off and muck with a bunch of other already finalized documents.

So... in short 'off link' just means 'dont call this a /127, call this
two ips that happen to live together on the same piece of
ethernet/sonet/frame/wifi'

-chris

>> and RA configuration, the network between the two routers is still a
>> directly connected network.  One router sends his packet to the other
>> without going thru any routed hop.  So what specifically fails for BGP
>> with an off-link addressing and RA configuration?
>
> A quote from IOS manual:
>
> ------------------
> A BGP routing process will verify the connection of single-hop eBGP
> peering session (TTL=254) to determine if the eBGP peer is directly
> connected to the same network segment by default. If the peer is not
> directly connected to same network segment, connection verification will
> prevent the peering session from being established.
> ------------------
> http://cisco.biz/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/ip_route/command/reference/ip2_n1g
> t.html#wp1109875
>
> Miya
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to