On 7/28/10 8:28 PM, Miya Kohno wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> According to the rfc4861, "off-link" is defined as follows: "the
> opposite of "on-link"; an address that is not assigned to any
> interfaces on the specified link."
> 
> BGP checks if an eBGP peer is directly connected by comparing the
> peer address against directly connected interface addresses.
> 
> So I was afraid it could be incompatible.

I don't think it is.  Router implementations that I am familiar with do
not use the NDP prefix state (on- or off-link) to determine if a BGP
peer is directly connected.

Regards,
Brian

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to