On 21/09/10 9:36 PM, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Hesham Soliman wrote:
>
>> => Before getting into the merits of your idea, why do you want to do
>> that? A pointer to some requirements or an email with the foreseen
>> benefits would be useful.
>
> I mentioned it earlier in this thread (about 8 messages back), please see
> the message from "Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:31:05 +0200 (CEST)".
>
> "The whole L2 environment would need a lot less code, it basically would
> only need to be able to filter the above mechanisms, not inspect them."
=> Sorry I missed that email and a few others. But you're trying to optimise
something that already exists? I don't see the benefit of removing code at
the expense of having less reliable networks. I say less reliable because ND
allows for detecting changing conditions on the link without having to rely
on a central server. Doesn't look like a worthwhile activity IMHO.
Hesham
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
