> > In corporate environments it is very important that cross-correlation > > of log events can occur to support various operational processes (also > > over longer periods of time and for examining historical records). > > IPv4 did not randomly rotate end node identifiers in an uncorrelated > > manner, and the consequences of this new behaviour could be far reaching. > > Well, I think the jury is out on use of 4941 in enterprise environments. There > are advantages and disadvantages. Accountability is still manageable. > > But in general I agree with Ray's points. >
If the monitoring is the key role in your network and you have access to the inside of your whole network, the question is why you sacrifice your users privacy by having the same IID forever in the same network? You can use a monitoring system where log the MAC and IP addresses of the pcs. If the IP addresses changes, you can still monitor them based on their MAC and log this new IP address for this computer for further usage or any new events and keep this log for a certain period of time. Thanks for your comments. Regards, Hosnieh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
