On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote:
> So the point isn't that a /48 is a waste of space. It's that a /48 is > assumed, and because it is assumed, there are definitely bits available for > semantic prefix assignment. > I still don't understand. What the above sentences seem to be saying is that "there are bits available for semantic prefix assignment because RIRs assume /48 but users don't actually get /48". Is that your point? If so, I don't see how you can also state that there are enough bits to both give every user a /48 and to use semantic prefix bits.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
