If the SP allocates users the equivalent of a /48 divided up as multiple >/48s 
with semantic meaning to each of the assigned prefixes, then the user's got a 
/48, and the SP's got their semantic bits.

Ian

From: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com<mailto:lore...@google.com>>
Date: Wednesday, 5 June 2013 05:42
To: Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com<mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com>>
Cc: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com<mailto:o...@delong.com>>, 
"<v6...@ietf.org<mailto:v6...@ietf.org>>" 
<v6...@ietf.org<mailto:v6...@ietf.org>>, "ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>" 
<ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>, 
"draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-pre...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-pre...@tools.ietf.org>"
 
<draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-pre...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-pre...@tools.ietf.org>>,
 Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com<mailto:rdroms.i...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than 
locator?//draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix-03
Resent-To: <boyang...@huawei.com<mailto:boyang...@huawei.com>>, Ian Farrer 
<ian.far...@telekom.de<mailto:ian.far...@telekom.de>>, 
<jiangsh...@huawei.com<mailto:jiangsh...@huawei.com>>, 
<sunqi...@ctbri.com.cn<mailto:sunqi...@ctbri.com.cn>>

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ted Lemon 
<ted.le...@nominum.com<mailto:ted.le...@nominum.com>> wrote:
So the point isn't that a /48 is a waste of space.   It's that a /48 is 
assumed, and because it is assumed, there are definitely bits available for 
semantic prefix assignment.

I still don't understand. What the above sentences seem to be saying is that 
"there are bits available for semantic prefix assignment because RIRs assume 
/48 but users don't actually get /48". Is that your point?

If so, I don't see how you can also state that there are enough bits to both 
give every user a /48 and to use semantic prefix bits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to