On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Sander Steffann <san...@steffann.nl> wrote: > So they playing field is mixed. Some do /56, but the major players do (or > will do) /48.
Sure, but you're just confirming my point that if a provider wants to do semantic prefixes, they can get enough bits to do them by allocating a /56 to customers instead of a /48. The point is not to catalog the various choices providers have made, but simply to point out that "bit scarcity" is not a good argument to use against semantic prefixes. If they are a bad idea, which they may well be, it is for some other reason. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
